cognitive fun!

Learn your mind. Play it too.
Who's 'whoswho'?
cevapcici | 3 years ago Reply Link me
Who's 'whoswho'?
Wondering who user 'whoswho' is... Respect for coming to this site and smashing most of the best scores here.

How far have you got to on the PASAT - level 8, 9?
cevapcici | 3 years ago Reply
excuse a n00b -- i thought PASAT on this site only went up to 5?
? | 3 years ago Reply
no, you are 1337 for you have truth
? | 3 years ago Reply
PASAT 8. I understand that you're surprised by that. But I am just one 'human' like you and most of the users on this site. ;)
whoswho | 3 years ago Reply
Interesting article on PASAT: http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/Class/Psy158H/PrevHonors/Z08/literature_review.htm

whoswho may be a highly educated mathematician. Pardon my hypothesizing whilst you dodge cevapcici's question. ;^)
argumzio | 3 years ago Reply
Sorry for delaying. I've been very busy these days.

I'm just a university student majoring in medical field.
whoswho | 3 years ago Reply
Very good. Perhaps you entertain other interests besides those in the medical field. You need not expound on that.

If not through amazement, then maybe by way of envy you have excited others to reach to the higher levels of PASAT. I always find this is a healthy form of motivation.

I wonder what practical application such a skill entails, however....
argumzio | 3 years ago Reply
Because there was no clear front runner for the higher reaches of the PASAT, one should not be surprised when someone turns up who fits the bill.

To continue the guinea-piggery, what I would like to know about whoswho is whether his/her standardised scores and educational experience have been similarly stellar.

(Amusingly, one of the papers referenced in the above article: 'The subjective experience of PASAT testing: Does the PASAT induce negative mood?')
cevapcici | 3 years ago Reply
This abstract also mentions a notable "amount of anxiety and frustration" in test-takers. I have to admit that upon first taking the test it did not leave one with a pleasant feeling.

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Jan;21(1):53-76. Epub 2005 Nov 14. A comprehensive review of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). Tombaugh TN.

The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) was developed to assess the effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on cognitive functioning. Subsequent research has shown that the PASAT has clinical utility in detecting impairments in cognitive processing in patients with a wide variety of neuropsychological syndromes. Gronwall and Sampson (1974) originally assumed the PASAT measured speed of information processing. However, the PASAT is now recognized as a measure of multiple functional domains because it requires the successful completion of a variety of cognitive functions, primarily those related to attention. While the PASAT has demonstrated good psychometric properties such as high levels of internal consistency and test-retest reliability, several issues should be considered when administering and interpreting this test. For example, test-retest scores show that the PASAT is extremely susceptible to practice effects. The PASAT is also negatively affected by increasing age, decreasing IQ, and low math ability. Administration of the PASAT creates an undue amount of anxiety and frustration in participants which affects their performance on this and other neuropsychological tests, and may subsequently increase their reluctance to return for follow up testing. Demands for rapid responding place individuals with speech or language impairment at a distinct disadvantage, as it does for those who naturally speak slowly for cultural or geographic reasons. In conclusion, the PASAT represents a reliable test that has legitimate but restricted clinical applications. A low score on the PASAT may not necessarily indicate or confirm the presence of neurological pathology. The PASAT is a highly sensitive, non-specific test and as such, care must be taken to identify the reasons underlying any low score before interpreting it as clinically significant.
argumzio | 3 years ago Reply
Standardized score - IQ ?

On the intelligence tests such as WAIS-r or Advanced Raven's Progressive Matrices, I got the ceiling score.
whoswho | 3 years ago Reply
There are so many reasons why telling people you're intelligent isn't really all that intelligent.
? | 3 years ago Reply
i'm a moron. what you think?
? | 3 years ago Reply
That is very intelligent of you to say so, of course.
? | 3 years ago Reply
> print 'Hello, World! I am a moron!'
Hello, World! I am a moron!
? | 3 years ago Reply
apparently, python has become sentient!
sock_licker | 3 years ago Reply
Or was programmed to grant the illusion of sentience....
? | 3 years ago Reply
is it fun?
? | 3 years ago Reply
I'm afraid my American Quotient isn't high enough to understand what "fun" is.
? | 3 years ago Reply
then so be it
? | 3 years ago Reply
very true, but to be fair to the chap he was answering a straight question.
? | 3 years ago Reply
Yeah, I'll say those are some absurdly impressive results!

So really though, memory savant, just a super genius, or did you practice day and night somewhere else just to spit us all (which would probably still entail genius)? :)
benjamin | 3 years ago Reply
Here we go with the hackneyed "you're a genius!"

Let me ask whoswho a meaningful question: how long have you been training on PASAT?
? | 3 years ago Reply
Just a few. But with intense concentration. ;)
whoswho | 3 years ago Reply
I'm not a savant.

But I always feel that my memory or process speed are somewhat different from other people. That's all.
whoswho | 3 years ago Reply
This raises the question as to how someone like Kim Peek would do on the dual n-back. Granted, Peek is an extreme case of deficits and recall talents; savants with overall higher functioning might be more amenable to training; though given the dual nature of the task, they may not perform any better than someone with a similar IQ...but I would be curious to know if savants have advantage or not on dual tasks.
milestones | 3 years ago Reply
Well..
I think savnats never can perform the task. 'Cause WM consists not only of STM storage but also of executive function(or central executive) which is maybe a weak point of them.
? | 3 years ago Reply
Although I know everyone can recognizes the correct pattern by conceptually driven processing, I have to modify this;'savnats' to 'savants'
? | 3 years ago Reply

Login to save scores

© 2008-2009 cognitivefun.net | about | widgets | blog | cognitive neuroscience for everyone