<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>cognitive fun! talk RSS</title>
  <link>http://cognitivefun.net</link>
  <description>Cognitive neuroscience for everyone!</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:39:06 -0800</pubDate>
  <item>
  <title>If your score is colored green, then it is better (than the mean); if it is red, then it is worse (than the mean). Some tests are reverse scored, but the coloration is there to make it even more... obvious.</title>
  <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:36:09 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://cognitivefun.net/talk/post/18862#r_19492</link>
    
</item><item>
  <title>I think the proper way to interpret it is to say that if you z-score is -2, you are scoring 2 standard deviations below the mean. If we are talking about a test like a time test--where lower is better--that is a very good thing.</title>
  <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:02:19 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://cognitivefun.net/talk/post/18862#r_19487</link>
    
</item><item>
  <title>Here's a calculator you can play with so that you can understand how it works: http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calc22.aspx

Here's an answer that Dr. Math provided for the same question: http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/68384.html

You don't need to study statistics. It's really very simple mathematics.</title>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 09:45:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://cognitivefun.net/talk/post/18862#r_18867</link>
    
</item><item>
  <title>I could be wrong but with reaction time based tests mental power/efficacy is inversely related to time so faster time = below the mean (-z score) but above average ability.  I think...</title>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:28:29 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://cognitivefun.net/talk/post/18862#r_18866</link>
    
</item><item>
  <title>e.g., on Stroop colors test, I show app. 44% above the refernce, yet have a negative 0.2 z score. That seems to mean I'm below hte mean by ).2 standard deviations, no? 

and, what's the standard deviation for this sub population? 16? 

Thanks for help/patience; i did not study statistics</title>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:40:59 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://cognitivefun.net/talk/post/18862#r_18864</link>
    
</item><item>
  <title>I've reviewed some of the posts here and the links to the statistics sites describing Z scores but I remain confused, so pardon my revisiting this issue. 

I have several scores that are shown as very substantially above the "reference." I thought the "reference" was the arithmetic mean for the CF site. Yet, I have received negative Z scores, which seem to indicate that I'm below the mean. Wassup?</title>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:21:49 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://cognitivefun.net/talk/post/18862#r_18863</link>
    
</item><item>
  <title>Confused about Z Scores, etc.</title>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:21:49 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://cognitivefun.net/talk/post/18862#r_18862</link>
    
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
